Obedience of the prophet : Obey GOD and Obey the Messenger

PART 1.

Of salmon

Obedience and obedience of the prophet

The talk was seen in a serious attempt to call legitimacy after the hadith and the Sunnah of the prophet, and to play an interpretation of the koranic order " obedience to God and the messenger

And they claim that obedience is obedience to the Qur ' an, obedience to the prophet, obedience to his personal words and his

They add that if obedience is the same as obedience to the holy Qur ' an, then God said, "obey God".

Thus, in its understanding, the inclusion of the messenger is that the prophet himself is a group of religious teachings outside the holy Quran that we must obey.

With guidance from the holy Koran, the error can easily be revealed in this claim. In the light of the holy Qur ' an, it can easily be seen that "obedience to the messenger" is obeyed because it is the message of the holy
Another.

Peace Ayaikum

Obey GOD and Obey the Messenger

The hadith followers in their earnest attempt to advocate the legality of following the hadith and sunna of the prophet, play on a corrupted interpretation of the Qur'anic command to “obey GOD and obey the Messenger”.

They claim that obeying GOD is to obey the Quran while as obeying the Messenger is to obey his hadith personal sayings and his sunnah methods

They add that if obeying the Messenger was the same thing as obeying GOD’s Quran, then GOD would have only said Obey GOD.

Thus to their understanding, GOD's inclusion of “obey the Messenger” implies that the Messenger has his own set of religious teachings outside of the Quran that we must obey.

With the guidance of the Quran, the error in this claim can easily be exposed. In the light of the Quran it can easily be seen that to “obey the Messenger” is to obey the message he delivered the Quran and nothing else.

I must say, "obey the messenger":

Insert the words " obedience to the messenger " after " obedience to God " serves a number of important reasons:

A-who among the sahaba of the prophet heard any of the verses of God directly from God?

Not one! As a result, they only respond to the sniper's fund through the delivery of Ahmed in the holy Koran.

This again makes it necessary for people to obey the messenger because it is he who delivers the message of God to them. Moreover, the messenger did not just provide the holy Quran and disappear!

The Prophet spent all years of receiving revelation first until his death invited all people to believe and follow the holy Qur ' an.

It is therefore necessary for God to tell all mankind to obey the messenger who is invited to follow the holy Koran.

B -" the Qur ' an " revealed to Muhammad that he will be done for the community, which was composed mainly of worshippers, but also some of his followers from the previous Bible, like Jews and Christians / supporters -"

Once again, the followers of the Bible are to understand the purpose of the phrase "mi obedience".

To make this clear, let us assume that it was in the Koran and did not include the phrase " obedience to the messenger " but only to " obey God ".

Immediately, to say his supporters Christians and Jews: but we truly obey God, God has sent us the Bible and obey! "

And then, the phrase, "the obedience of the messenger" in a message to them is the Quran.

Revelation of the holy Qur ' an is greater than the retention of all the previous writers:

" then we revealed this bible, sincerely, confirming previous books, and the them." 5:48

1. the need to say "obey the Messenger":
Insert the words "obey the Messenger" after "obey Allah" serves a number of important reasons:⬇️

A-who among the companions of the Prophet had heard any of the verses of Allah directly from Allah?

No one! As a result, do not respond to GOD through delivery of Ahmad in the Qur'an.

This again makes it necessary to obey Allah's Apostle people because he is the one who delivers the message of Allah. Moreover, the Apostle did not only give the Qur'an and disappear!

Prophet who spent years of time receiving revelation first until his death to invite all people believe and follow the Quran.

And then Allah necessary to tell all people to obey the Prophet who is invited to follow the Qur'an⬇️

B-"the Quran revealed to Mohamed that he will fulfil the community consisted mainly of Idol worshippers but also some followers of previous Bible like Jews and Christians/nasasrah 2.

Again, in favor of following the Bible to understand the aims of the phrase "Meissner even said to obey."

To make this clear, let us assume that in the Qur'an and did not contain the words "obey the Messenger" but is only to "obey Allah."

Immediately, say nasasrah 2. Christians and Jews: but we really obey Allah, Allah has sent us the Bible and obey! "And then, the words" obey the Messenger "which is included in a message delivered by Ahmed them Quran Quran supports himself as a recent revelation of Allah to all mankind.

Revealing the Qur'an to mankind than all previous book retention:

"Then we revealed to you this Scripture, truthfully, confirming previous books, superseding them." 5:48.
-----------------------------------------

2- The duty of the Messenger:

“And obey GOD and obey the messenger and be cautious; but if you turn back, then know that the SOLE DUTY of the messenger is the deliverance of the message 5:92

“And obey GOD and obey the messenger, but if you turn back, then upon Our messenger is the SOLE DUTY of the clear delivery of the message 64:12

Now, if we look at these Ayaat, we notice that GOD has clearly pointed out the ONLY duty of the Messenger, i.e. that he must DELIVER the message Quran

The word Messenger is derived from the word Message. A Messenger delivers a Message. If there were no message there would not be a messenger. To Obey the Messenger would thus mean to obey the message he is delivering.

---------------------------------------

3- Is it obey “Ahmed” or “obey the Messenger”?

GOD is the most efficient in expressing any meaning. All Quranic words are chosen by GOD to convey a precise meaning.

We never read anywhere in the Quran words like “Obey GOD and obey Ahmed” or obey Jesus, or Moses……….always the word messenger……..this is to emphasise once again that what is to be obeyed is the “message” of GOD and not the personal words or views of the messenger.

As mentioned earlier, the word Messenger is derived from the word Message. If there were no message there would not be a messenger. To Obey the Messenger would thus mean to obey the message he is delivering.

------------------------------------
4- The only “message” revealed to Ahmed was the Quran:

In reply to this Quranic truth, the proponents of hadith claim that they have no problem with the fact that the only duty of Ahmed was to deliver the message, but they quickly add that the hadith and sunna of Ahmed are part of the “message” and were inspiration from GOD

➡️ They base such claim on a corrupted interpretion of 53:3-4. As a matter of fact, they claim that besides the hadith of Ahmed which they claim was inspired they claim that Ahmed received additional revelation directly from GOD outside the Quran which they call the ‘Hadith Al-Qudsy’ or the ‘sacred hadith’!

----------------------------------------
For more info on the corruption of 53:3-4, please see:

The corruption of 53:3-4

With the guidance of the Quran we can quickly establish that Ahmed did not receive ANY revelation from GOD other than the Quran.

Yes the prophet was inspired by GOD  in certain personal matter, an example of that is found in 66:3 where God inspired the prophet regarding the truth of a domestic issue. However, this was mere inspiration from GOD and not revelation.

The difference between inspiration and revelation is that GOD inspires all humans note how God inspired the mother of Moses

GOD also inspires the animals example of that is in 16:68 where GOD tells us how He inspires the bees.  This is different from revelation which is specificaly an inspired scripture which contains religious laws and prohibitions.

➡️ Note here that hadith followers uphold the hadith and sunna as the second source of Islamic law besides the Quran, and by doing so they elevate the hadith to the status of revelation.

We are told in the Quran that the prophet did not receive any revelation from GOD other than the Quran:

“Say What thing is ‘Akbar Shahada’ greatest testimony Say: GOD is a Witness between me and you; this QURAN has been revealed to me by inspiration that with it I may warn you and all whom it reaches BALAGHA 6:19

➡️ This testimony which GOD describes as “Akbar Shahada” “Greatest Testimony” commands Ahmed to testify that He received the Quran from GOD. This testimony speaks of only one revelation received by Ahmed from GOD which is the Quran.

~>If Ahmed truly received other revelation from GOD other than the Quran, would we not find any mention of it in the Quran? Would GOD hide the fact that He gave Ahmed revelation outside the Quran and then command us to obey it?

Moreover, to insist that every word uttered by the prophet was even inspiration (let alone revelation) is once again to show ignorance with the Quran. We are given in the Quran six different cases where the prophet committed errors for which he was reprimanded by GOD

The question here is how can someone who’s every word is inspired by GOD commit ANY errors? Could GOD be inspiring mistakes to His prophet!!!

Part 2.

GOD promises to preserve the Quran and nothing else:

“Absolutely, we have revealed the ‘Zhikr’ Quran and, absolutely, we will preserve it.” 15:9

These words proclaim GOD's  promise to preserve the Quran. We do not read anywhere else in the Quran that GOD would preserve the personal sayings of the messenger. In actual fact, GOD did not preserve His Own previous scripture Torah and Injeel why would He preserve the human words of one of His servants?

Is GOD elevating His servant to be a legislating god besides Him when GOD tells us that the SOLE duty of the messenger is to deliver His message?

But that is not all, we are told in the Quran that anything which is not from GOD would ultimately contain many contradictions and corruptions:

“If it were from other than GOD, they would have found in it numerous contradictions.” 4:82

Despite these clear ayat, the followers of hadith have made claims that their cherished hadith books (primarily Bukhari and Muslim) are fully authentic Sahih and without corruption!

Do they not believe GOD's words in 15:9 and 4:82?

The command to follow the Quran and nothing else:

In the Quran GOD commands all believers to follow the Quran Alone, this command is found in numerous verses, the following are examples:

“These are GOD's revelations that We recite to you truthfully. In which Hadith other than God and His revelations do they believe?” 45:6

“Shall I seek other than GOD as a source of law, when He has revealed to you this book fully detailed?”6:114

This clear command once again confirms that obeying the messenger is confined to obeying the “message” he delivered from GOD Quran and nothing else.

Are we commanded to follow the Sunna of Ahmed's

The followers of hadith and Sunna use a corrupted meaning of 33:21 to imply that we should follow the methodology of the messenger and thus we need to follow his Sunna!

To expose the corruption and manipulation in such claim, let us first read 33:21

“The messenger of GOD has set up a good example for those among you who seek GOD and the Last Day, and constantly think about GOD.” 33:21

From these words we note that GOD is very specific in describing the capacity in which the prophet has set a good example. The good example lies in his constant thinking of God and how he sought GOD and the last day.

Sadly, the worshippers of hadith and Sunna have reduced this glorious ayat so as to imply that we should eat as the prophet ate, sleep as he did and even enter the toilet with the same foot which he used!!! …. this is among many other ridiculous do’s and do not’s that fill the books of hadith.

To make the issue undisputable, GOD has told us in the Quran that the only Sunna is the Sunna of GOD No where in the Quran is there any mention of the Sunna of Ahmed!!!!

“You will find that the Sunna of Allah is the only Sunna” 33:62….35:43…..48:23

Was the messenger authorised by GOD to issue any teachings besides the Quran?

GOD asserts to all believers that prophet Ahmed was commanded not to teach any other teachings, otherwise he would incur severe punishment from GOD:⬇️

“It the Quran is a revelation from the Lord of the universe. Had he uttered any other teachings, We would have grabbed him by the right, and We would have severed his Wateen Major artery of the heart none of you could have helped him.”69:43-47

Those who insist that the prophet left us a second source of religious law hadith are either accusing the prophet of disobeying GOD's commands in 69:43-47, or do not really understand the Quran.

Part 3.

The instructions left by the prophet

In accordance to 6:114, 69:43-47 and many other clear cut ayat, prophet Ahmed himself commanded his people not to write his own hadith, this is documented in Muslim and other books  IN THEIR BOOKS ⬇️

“Do not write down anything of me except the Quran. Whoever writes other than that should delete it” Ahmed, Vol. 1, page 171…..also Sahih Muslim

For the first 300 years after the death of the prophet, and in accordance with his instructions, the writing of his hadith was forbidden. The first one to document a comprehensive collection of hadith was Al-Bukhari (Note that Al-Bukhari was born in the year 194 After Hijrah

Even if we were to follow the hadith which we are not how accurate can a collection of sayings documented two centuries after the death of the prophet be?

The peculiar matter here is that the followers of hadith do not wish to obey the Quran nor do they want to obey the instructions left by the prophet! In their blind and stubborn adherence to the tales told by the likes of such narrators as Abu Huraira and others they make an astonishingly ridiculous claim.

They claim that the prophet issued these instructions not to write his hadith only in the first period of revelation and only because he was worried that his hadith would be mixed up with the Quran!

They add that these instructions were cancelled in his later years! Well, if that was the case, why did they wait two whole centuries before documenting the hadith? Did it take two centuries to prepare a copy of the Quran that did not have hadith mixed with it!!!

Moreover, by saying this ridiculous claim that the prophet was afraid that his hadith would be mixed up with the Quran they once again show their ignorance with the Quran.

In Sura 75 we are assured that God would secure the safe collection of the Quran:

“It is WE who will collect it into Quran.” 75:17

This promise from GOD about the safe collection of the Quran, plus the promise in 15:9 for the preservation of the Quran reduces the claim of the hadith followers that the prophet was worried that his words would get mixed up with the Quran  to utter nonesense. It is either they do not believe GOD or they do not believe the prophet’s trust in GOD ability.
.
Sourse:-
https://m.facebook.com/groups/715642505262490?view=permalink&id=804809183012488